Current:Home > reviewsClimate change is causing people to move. They usually stay local, study finds -Wealth Momentum Network
Climate change is causing people to move. They usually stay local, study finds
View
Date:2025-04-18 06:55:44
Most people who move because of climate change in the United States don't go far, and they end up in homes that are less threatened by the effects of global warming, according to new research. The findings underscore the degree to which climate-related relocation is a hyperlocal phenomenon that can nonetheless protect people from disasters such as floods and hurricanes.
Sociologists at Rice University studied thousands of homeowners who sold their extremely flood-prone homes to the government through a special federal program, administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The program has moved about 50,000 families out of flood zones since the 1980s, and demand for such federal buyouts is growing.
The study is the first to examine where those families ended up living, and it found that most people stayed within a 20-minute drive of their original homes. Most families also moved to homes with lower flood risk, meaning the program successfully accomplished its primary goal.
It makes sense that people are moving only short distances, says A.R. Siders, a faculty member at the Disaster Research Center at the University of Delaware. Most Americans who move for any reason do so within the same county, Siders says. "It's useful to see that, even when people are moving because of a flood-related program, they are staying close."
The study casts doubt on the idea that climate change could cause mass migration to places in the U.S. that are less disaster-prone, like New England or the Upper Midwest, Siders says.
The findings could also be good news for local officials in places where climate change is already driving catastrophic flooding. The cost of flood damage each year in the U.S. has more than quadrupled since the 1980s, according to FEMA, and the dangers are only growing because of climate-driven extreme rain, more intense hurricanes and rising seas.
In recent years, many local governments have expressed concern that helping people relocate could decimate their tax bases. Knowing that most people stay nearby could help alleviate that concern.
"You can help your constituents reduce their future flood risk without necessarily losing their tax dollars," says James Elliott, a sociologist at Rice University and one of the authors of the new study, which was published in the journal Environmental Research Letters.
Asking homeowners to voluntarily sell their flood-prone homes to the government is a crucial tool for reducing damage from floods and protecting people. Through the federal buyout program, the government pays market value for homes at risk and then demolishes them, with the goal of preventing future families from moving into harm's way.
Although demand for the program is growing, it has faced a slew of criticism for making homeowners wait years before their buyout is approved and for not making buyouts available to low-income households.
Relocating makes people much safer, the study found. On average families moved to homes with about 60% less flood risk, compared to where they used to live. That's equivalent to leaving a home that's likely to flood with a foot or more of water within the next 30 years, and instead moving somewhere with a small chance of a few inches of floodwater over that same time period.
Housing segregation persists as people move because of climate change
The researchers also considered how race affects where people move when they're fleeing flooding. Race is an important factor in studies of housing in America, because of widespread, entrenched housing segregation.
That racial segregation shows up in government efforts to help people move away from flood zones. An NPR investigation in 2019 found that majority-white neighborhoods received a disproportionate share of federal funds for flood-related relocation.
The new study goes further, by tracing where residents of those majority-white neighborhoods moved. They found that an overwhelming majority, 96%, of people who started in a majority-white neighborhood also ended up in such a neighborhood after they moved, meaning housing segregation persisted despite migration.
"If you're moving [away] from a majority-white neighborhood, you almost inevitably and exclusively will only relocate if you can find housing nearby in another majority-white neighborhood," Elliott says.
The study wasn't designed to tease apart the reasons for this, although it determined that people did not choose majority-white neighborhoods because those areas have less flood risk overall, or because property values there are higher. Follow-up studies will try to explore why homeowners chose the neighborhoods they did, and how race affected those decisions, Elliott says.
veryGood! (9956)
Related
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- Orville Peck praises Willie Nelson's allyship after releasing duet to gay cowboy anthem
- Jonathan Majors sentenced to domestic violence program for assault, avoids jail time
- Winner in Portland: What AP knows about the $1.3 billion Powerball jackpot so far
- All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
- Gwyneth Paltrow's Son Moses Shows Off Uncanny Resemblance to Chris Martin in New 18th Birthday Photo
- Are potatoes healthy? Settling the debate over sweet vs 'regular' once and for all
- Justice Department rejects House GOP bid to obtain audio of Biden interview with special counsel
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Did you look at the solar eclipse too long? Doctors explain signs of eye damage
Ranking
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- 3 dead, including gunman, after shooting inside Las Vegas law office, police say
- Half of Americans struggling to afford housing, survey finds
- Huskies repeat. Connecticut cruises past Purdue to win second national title in row
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Kourtney Kardashian Defends Her Postpartum Body Amid Pressure to Bounce Back
- Reactions to Elly De La Cruz's inside-the-park home run in Reds-Brewers game
- Suki Waterhouse Embraces Her Postpartum Body With Refreshing Message
Recommendation
Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
Solar flares reported during total eclipse as sun nears solar maximum. What are they?
Las Vegas Aces WNBA team gets bigger venue for game Caitlin Clark is anticipated to play in
'I lost my 3-year-old': Ohio mom shares tip that brought her child back to safety
Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
Effort to enshrine right to abortion in Maine Constitution comes up short in first votes
Former 'Blue's Clues' host Steve Burns shares 'horror and heartbreak' about 'Quiet on Set'
How dark will the solar eclipse be? Path of totality gives you a much different experience