Current:Home > InvestFormer prosecutor who resigned from Russia probe investigation tapped for state Supreme Court post -Wealth Momentum Network
Former prosecutor who resigned from Russia probe investigation tapped for state Supreme Court post
View
Date:2025-04-21 06:33:16
A former top federal prosecutor who resigned from the investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe has been tapped to fill an open seat on the Connecticut State Supreme Court.
Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont announced Nora Dannehy’s nomination on Friday, calling his former general counsel “a woman of integrity who pursues justice wherever the evidence may lead.” Besides the Trump-Russia probe, Dannehy is well known in Connecticut for leading the successful federal corruption prosecutions of former Republican Gov. John G. Rowland in 2004 and other public figures during her tenure as the first woman U.S. Attorney in Connecticut.
“Nora Dannehy is a person who knows what she knows, but you also know that she cares.” said Lamont, paraphrasing a quote from the late President Franklin D. Roosevelt. “She cares deeply about justice. She’s going to be an extraordinary associate justice on the Supreme Court.”
She will be presented to the Democratic-controlled General Assembly for consideration. Lawmakers are scheduled to meet for a special legislative session later this month.
Dannehy, a 62-year-old Connecticut native, served as U.S. Attorney for the District of Connecticut from 2008 to 2010. She later was appointed deputy attorney general for the state of Connecticut before becoming taking a job with United Technologies Corporation as associate general counsel for global ethics and compliance.
She rejoined the federal government in early 2019 to help then-Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham scrutinize how the FBI and other federal agencies set out to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and whether the Trump campaign had coordinated with the Kremlin.
Dannehy has not spoken publicly about her decision to leave the Durham investigation during the final stretch. On Friday, she did not take any questions from reporters. Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz, who has known Dannehy since high school, said the administration wanted to give the General Assembly’s Judiciary Committee the first opportunity to question Dannehy.
When a reporter suggested Dannehy will surely be asked about the Durham investigation during her confirmation hearing, Bysiewicz said, “we’ll leave that to the Legislature.”
In brief remarks, Dannehy thanked Lamont for his confidence in her and noted her desire to return to the public realm.
“Recently, I went into private practice with a small firm in Hartford, where I’ve had the fortune to work with excellent lawyers and upstanding people,” she said. “But my heart is in public service.”
Dannehy is Lamont’s second nominee to the state’s highest court this year. In May, Sandra Slack Glover, another federal prosecutor with no judicial experience, withdrew her name from consideration after state lawmakers raised questions about a letter she signed in 2017 supporting Amy Coney Barrett for a federal appeals court position.
Glover tried to assure Connecticut lawmakers that she would not have signed the 2017 letter if she knew Barrett would later vote to overturn Roe v. Wade abortion protections as a member of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Some lawmakers at the time voiced concern about her lack of judicial experience and said they had many unanswered questions about how she would perform on the bench.
On Friday, Lamont said he believes legislators are much more familiar with Dannehy. Also, he said his administration learned from the failed Glover nomination to talk to all the legislators and “make sure nobody jumps to conclusions” about a nominee’s record. He said he’s confident Dannehy will be confirmed.
There was some pushback Friday to Dannehy’s nomination from activists who contend Lamont should look beyond prosecutors for judicial candidates.
“Just like a jury needs to contain a cross section of the community with different points of view, different backgrounds and different heritage, the judiciary should contain a cross section of views across the legal system, said civil rights attorney Alexander Taubes, a member of the People’s Parity Project.
veryGood! (853)
Related
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Camila Cabello Gives Chilly Update After Carrying Ice Block at 2024 Met Gala
- Sphere in Las Vegas will host 2024 NHL draft, to be first televised event at venue
- The Fed just dashed hopes for lower mortgage rates. What homebuyers need to know.
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Illinois Lottery announces $4.1 million Lotto winner, third-largest 2024 jackpot in state
- Charm Necklaces Are The Jewelry Trend of Spring & Summer: Here Are The 13 Cutest Ones To Shop ASAP
- New Mexico high court upholds man’s 3 murder convictions in 2018 shooting deaths near Dixon
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Storms batter Midwest one day after tornado leaves at least 1 dead in Oklahoma
Ranking
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- CFL suspends former NFL QB Chad Kelly 9 games for violating gender-based violence policy
- 3 arrested in NYC after driver strikes pro-Palestinian protester following demonstration
- Why Kim Kardashian Needed Custom Thong Underwear for Her 2024 Met Gala Look
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Disney’s streaming business turns a profit in first financial report since challenge to Iger
- 15 House Democrats call on Biden to take border executive action
- FAA investigates Boeing for falsified records on some 787 Dreamliners
Recommendation
How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
Travis Kelce Scores First Major Acting Role in Ryan Murphy TV Show Grotesquerie
Americans are reluctantly spending $500 a year tipping, a new study says.
Judge in Trump’s classified documents case cancels May trial date; no new date set
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
Biden heads to Wisconsin to laud a new Microsoft facility, meet voters — and troll Trump
British AI startup raises more than $1 billion for its self-driving car technology
Justice Department warns it plans to sue Iowa over new state immigration law