Current:Home > InvestRekubit Exchange:A retirement expense of $413,000 you'll need to be prepared for -Wealth Momentum Network
Rekubit Exchange:A retirement expense of $413,000 you'll need to be prepared for
Burley Garcia View
Date:2025-04-09 16:51:11
Retirees should be Rekubit Exchangeprepared to cover all of their costs from their Social Security and savings. Most people think about expenses like housing, cars and travel when they predict their future financial needs. But, there's another important expense you cannot overlook: healthcare.
While you may assume Medicare will pay for everything you need, that couldn't be further from the truth. A recent study has shown the out-of-pocket costs of medical care could be far higher than you might imagine.
Retirees may need a six-figure nest egg for healthcare costs
According to the Employee Benefit Research Institute, a couple with high prescription drug needs will require $413,000 in savings earmarked for medical care to have a 90% chance of being able to cover all of their expenses. While Medicare offers coverage to seniors, there are copays and coinsurance costs as well as limits on what it pays for.
While $413,000 is on the high end of the scale for those who need more prescriptions than most, EBRI's data also showed even the typical senior will require a lot of money for medical care:
- The typical man needs $184,000 in savings to have a 90% chance of meeting out-of-pocket healthcare spending needs.
- A typical woman needs $217,000.
- A couple with a standard Medigap plan charging average premiums would require $351,000.
All of these are big numbers and you could find yourself quickly draining your 401(k) if you aren't prepared to pay up.
How can you be ready to cover healthcare costs in retirement?
Since medical care will be a huge expense for many seniors, it's important to prepare financially throughout your lifetime so you're ready when doctor visits begin and drug prescriptions must be filled.
If you're eligible for a health savings account (HSA), investing in one each year is the best way to prepare for senior care expenses. An HSA allows you to make tax-deductible contributions up to the annual limits. You don't have to use the money right away -- you can invest it each year and allow it to grow tax-free. And, as long as the funds are used for qualifying care expenses, you can even take tax-free withdrawals.
The triple tax benefits of an HSA are unlike any other account. Even tax-advantaged retirement plans like a 401(k) or IRA only give you a tax break either when you contribute or when you withdraw money, but not both. And, as a bonus, if you don't use your HSA for healthcare, you can take money out for any reason penalty-free after age 65. You'll just pay taxes on the withdrawals, similar to a 401(k).
Now, not everyone can invest in an HSA, as you need a qualifying high-deductible health plan to do so. If you aren't eligible, you may want to think about opening an IRA that you specifically dedicate to healthcare savings. You can contribute to this account along with your other retirement plans so you'll have the money you need for doctors and everything else your future self will require.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets" »
veryGood! (1364)
Related
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Of the 63 national parks, these had the most fatalities since 2007.
- Emma Roberts says she's lost jobs because of 'nepo baby' label
- Why My Big Fat Fabulous Life's Whitney Way Thore Is Accepting the Fact She Likely Won't Have Kids
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Vying for West Virginia Governor, an ‘All of the Above’ Democrat Faces Long Odds Against a Republican Fossil Fuel Booster
- Travis Kelce Joined by Patrick and Brittany Mahomes at Taylor Swift's Amsterdam Eras Tour Show
- Shelter-in-place order briefly issued at North Dakota derailment site, officials say
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Missy Elliott is a music trailblazer. Here's what to know about her influence.
Ranking
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- Is a great gas station bathroom the key to uniting a divided America?
- Margot Robbie Is Pregnant, Expecting First Baby With Husband Tom Ackerley
- Keir Starmer becomes U.K. prime minister after his Labour Party wins huge majority in general election
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Morgan Wallen should be forgiven for racial slur controversy, Darius Rucker says
- Scorched by history: Discriminatory past shapes heat waves in minority and low-income neighborhoods
- Klay Thompson posts heartfelt message to Bay Area, thanks Warriors
Recommendation
California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
3 men killed in weekend shooting at homeless encampment near Los Angeles, police say
Voters in France’s overseas territories kick off a pivotal parliamentary election
Michigan friends recount the extraordinary moment they rescued a choking raccoon
Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
WWE NXT Heatwave 2024: Time, how to watch, match card and more
Jon Landau dies at 63: James Cameron, Zoe Saldana honor 'Avatar,' 'Titanic' producer
A US appeals court will review its prior order that returned banned books to shelves in Texas