Current:Home > MyNevada's Washoe County votes against certifying recount results of 2 local primaries -Wealth Momentum Network
Nevada's Washoe County votes against certifying recount results of 2 local primaries
View
Date:2025-04-13 05:21:17
Commissioners in Washoe County, Nevada's second most populous county, refused Tuesday to certify the results of local recounts from two June primaries, an unusual move that may have implications for the presidential race in one of the nation's battleground states.
The three Republican members on the five-member Washoe County Board of Commissioners voted to reject the results of the recounts in one race for a commission seat and another for a local school board seat. It's not clear what will happens next.
There's been no comment from the county elections department, the district attorney's office or the state attorney general. A request for comment from the secretary of state was not immediately returned.
The rejection of the recounts and questions about how to handle it raised concerns about what might happen in November should a local commission refuse to certify the presidential election results.
Election certification used to be a fairly dry, ministerial event, but since the 2020 elections, it has turned into a pressure point. During the midterm elections two years later, a scenario similar to what's happening in Washoe County occurred in New Mexico after that state's primary, when a rural county delayed certification of the results and relented only after the secretary of state appealed to the state's supreme court.
The Washoe County vote was first reported by KRNV-TV.
The certification standoff is the latest election controversy to roil the county, which includes Reno and its suburbs and has narrowly voted for the Democrat in the last two presidential contests. Conspiracy theories about voting machines and distrust of election administrators have led to harassment and high turnover in the local election office the past four years. They also were on display Tuesday during the commission meeting in downtown Reno.
The public comments were filled by residents who alleged irregularities in the election, demanded a hand-count of ballots and sometimes spouted false claims of stolen elections and a "cabal" within the county.
Against that backdrop, and rapid election staff turnover, the county elections department has also made certain administrative mistakes, like sending mail ballots to voters who had opted out of receiving them and misprinting certain local sample ballots, though none that affect tabulation.
Two of the Republican commissioners, Jeanne Herman and Mike Clark, have consistently voted against certifying results and are supported by the wider movement within the county that promotes election conspiracy theories. Republican Clara Andriola, who that movement has targeted in the primaries, joined them in voting against certification of the recounts, one of which involved the primary race she won.
"There's a lot of information that has been shared that in my opinion warrants further investigation," said Andriola, who had not previously voted against certifying results. She referenced several "hiccups" by the elections department and referenced public commenters who raised concerns.
She said she was appreciative of the county elections department but wanted to take the certification results to other governing or judicial bodies. She acknowledged that it is not immediately clear which particular entity that will be.
The commission's two Democratic members voted against rejecting the recount results, which changed just one vote in each of the two races. The board had previously voted to certify the other races from last month's primary 3-2, with Andriola voting in favor.
- In:
- Reno
- New Mexico
- Voting
- Elections
- Politics
- Nevada
veryGood! (111)
Related
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Fuzzy Math: How Do You Calculate Emissions From a Storage Tank When The Numbers Don’t Add Up?
- An Arctic Offshore Drilling Plan Advances, but Impact Statement Cites Concerns
- 6 teenagers injured in Milwaukee shooting following Juneteenth festivities
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- This Week in Clean Economy: Green Cards for Clean Energy Job Creators
- 13 years after bariatric surgery, a 27-year-old says it changed her life
- Music program aims to increase diversity in college music departments
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- This Week in Clean Economy: Cost of Going Solar Is Dropping Fast, State Study Finds
Ranking
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Deforestation Is Getting Worse, 5 Years After Countries and Companies Vowed to Stop It
- NFL Legend Jim Brown Dead at 87
- Ireland is paying up to $92,000 to people who buy homes on remote islands. Here's how it works.
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Basketball powers Kansas and North Carolina will face each other in home-and-home series
- Trump Admin. Halts Mountaintop Mining Health Risks Study by National Academies
- Grief and tangled politics were at the heart of Kentucky's fight over new trans law
Recommendation
Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
Rover Gas Pipeline Builder Faces Investigation by Federal Regulators
Why Vanderpump Rules' Lala Kent and Scheana Shay's Bond Over Motherhood Is as Good as Gold
Blinken says military communication with China still a work in progress after Xi meeting
B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
The Taliban again bans Afghan women aid workers. Here's how the U.N. responded
Anne Hathaway's Stylist Erin Walsh Explains the Star's Groundbreaking Fashion Era
What Does ’12 Years to Act on Climate Change’ (Now 11 Years) Really Mean?